King lays down law after Sussex summer circus

King lays down law after Sussex summer circus
View on original source
Category: Politics
Share
Archive
Like
The King has laid down the law. As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex settle into Britain, they do so as private citizens: no more, no less. Politely, carefully, and through the mechanism of a very royal arms-length letter, the King has spelt out his views: there is a line, and the Sussexes will not cross it. There are to be no "HRH"s, no pretend-royal charity works, and no confusion. The Sussexes' position, said the Lord Chamberlain, on behalf of the King, "is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests". Ouch. On the face of it, nothing has changed: they remain out of The Firm by choice, no one needs to call them "Royal Highness" and their patronage is not royal. For seasoned royal-watchers though, there is no mistaking the significance. After a summer of the "Sussex circus", as it has become known across Fleet Street, the Royal family – via a senior aide – has moved to silence the growing questions about Prince Harry returning to the royal fold. The Duke and Duchess "stepped down from undertaking representative duties on behalf of the sovereign, and are no longer working Members of the Royal family", writes Lord Benyon. "There is no change to the current status of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex." The King had been under considerable pressure to act. Some had called for him to "address the nation" on the matter of his younger son; calmer heads urged a more elegant way of clarifying a new status quo. As the Sussexes returned to Britain, after making clear they believed their self-created "half-in, half-out" model could work, there were deep concerns about how far the King could be seen to be pushed. The line of succession, Harry's role as Counsellor of State, the presence of the Sussexes at royal family moments: issues put on the back burner while they lived in California were suddenly front and centre again. The Duke intends to continue his work with Invictus, it is said, as well as old patronages including WellChild and Scotty's Little Soldiers. What had been billed, for a few years, as regular "visits" back to Britain has morphed into full-time work and a life based in Harry's homeland. While the Duchess settles Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet into a new school, thoughts have already turned to how she will build a meaningful life here alongside her work on the jam and flower petals of her As Ever brand. There is "no half-on, half-out", said the palace. "I will always be part of the Royal Family," said Prince Harry, in April."We've tested the playbook, it worked," said a source close to the Sussexes of the half-in, half-out concept during their trip to Australia this year. "This could absolutely act as a blueprint for the future." Then it was in the abstract; now, it is not. Other matters have come sharply into focus. Would the Duke's determination to be recognised as a military veteran let Remembrance Sunday descend into briefings about his wreath-laying? Would the Sussexes be photographed at royal family events before advertising the clothes they were wearing on a shopping app, as the Duchess did in Australia? Will the narrative about "reconciliation" with Prince William ever end? Can the ordinary public, who have other things on their mind, be expected to see the nuance between working and non-working royals, if the latter carries on with the same old "engagements" they were doing six years ago before they left on a "freedom flight"? There was a time when the palace seemed minded to wait and see. That time is now at an end. As speculation grows over the Sussexes reintegrating themselves into British public life, so institutions with close ties to the monarchy have been left with questions. Very few wanted to be caught between The Firm and the fifth-in-line to the throne, who went rogue and has now returned. And so the King, with the support of the Prince of Wales and the wider Royal family, gave his blessing for matters to be clarified. In writing, and with no room for misunderstanding, the terms have been spelt out in a letter sent to a handful of people including the Sussexes' own team. To outsiders reading the careful wording, it may at first glance look like business as usual. It was sent simply to "help avoid doubt or confusion", it was said, after the palace received a "number of requests for guidance" about the Sussexes' situation. In the sleekest of palace-speak, it spelt out that the King is entirely supportive of the Sussexes' own expressed wishes. The Duke and Duchess's position, "distinct" as it is "from the State and Royal duties undertaken by the working Royal Family, and with the personal latitude it brings the couple in respect of financial independence and protection of their privacy as they would wish", will "continue to be fully respected", it said. As the business of a new royal term gets under way, and a 13-year-old future King starts at Eton this week, there can be no misunderstanding. No HRH, no half-in half-out, and no confusion. The Sussexes are private citizens, just as they want to be.

(0)Comments

 

A note on cookies

Newshunt uses essential cookies to keep you signed in and to remember your language and country, so the site works the way you expect. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics cookies to understand how people use Newshunt and improve it over time.

Accepting only affects analytics. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy or Terms & Conditions.