The board adopted a lien resolution to recover unpaid fines and penalties tied to 30818 Bambi Drive. Image for this article September 7, 2026 • 6:52 PM
Shasta County supervisors approved a lien against a Shingletown property to recover $113,200 in unpaid nuisance-abatement fines and penalties.
In a resolution adopted Aug. 25, the Board of Supervisors said the lien would be recorded against 30818 Bambi Drive, listed in the document as the property tied to an amended Jan. 9, 2026, decision and order by Administrative Hearing Officer Katie Bellotti Porter. The resolution says that order found nuisance conditions on the property and directed the owners, Elliott Landy and Bianca R. Schofield, to abate violations including a failing septic system and accumulated junk and refuse.
According to the resolution, the county demanded payment on July 1, 2026, but the owners did not pay the assessed amount or meet the deadlines in the hearing officer's order. The lien was authorized under Government Code §53069.4 and Shasta County Code §1.12.050(B)(6), and the document says it will accrue interest at the legal rate, listed as 10% per year under California Code of Civil Procedure §685.010.
An attached exhibit identifies the parcel as APN 094-210-023-000 and shows the $113,200 balance as unpaid.
The board's approval shifts the debt into the county's lien system, allowing it to be collected against the property.
Supervisors are being asked to open a hearing and adopt two enforcement resolutions tied to 30818 Bambi Dr., including a special assessment and a lien. The Sidekick 14 minutes ago Unknown
The county's abatement summary for 20290 Sylvia Ln. in Redding documents a finalized enforcement action, including $81,237.06 in costs and $131,500 in fines and penalties. The Sidekick 15 minutes ago Unknown
The county approved a special assessment and a lien against the same Anderson property to collect unpaid abatement costs, fines and penalties. Unknown
Council waived second reading and approved a new Chapter 8.24 that updates nuisance definitions, penalties, appeals and garbage-container rules. Yuba-Sutter
The council took the first formal step on a rewrite that would broaden nuisance definitions, shift hearing authority to the city manager and allow the city to seek attorney fees in nuisance-abatement cases. Unknown
The Aug. 5 meeting also included a consent-calendar approval of the city's artificial intelligence rules and the introduction of a nuisance-code overhaul that would change abatement hearings and legal-cost recovery. Unknown
The Local Government Committee deadlocked 2-2 on the bill, leaving it stalled but still eligible for reconsideration. Yuba-Sutter
Council moved a rewrite of the city's nuisance code forward after residents raised concerns about garbage-can rules and entry authority. Yuba-Sutter
Supervisors backed special assessments and abatement liens totaling more than $398,000 for 15589 Vierra Road after two cost-accounting hearings. Yuba-Sutter
Councilmembers voted 3-1 to move ahead with a broad rewrite of nuisance rules, including an amendment to the garbage-can language. Yuba-Sutter
© 2026 The Sidekick. All rights reserved.
Designed for community awareness.
(0)Comments