Subscribe now
Friends,
For decades in the professional world, I operated under a single, unshakeable doctrine:if it cannot be measured, it does not matter.
In corporate environments, marketing departments, and data-driven management, clarity comes from numbers. Key performance indicators, return on investment, quarterly reach, impressions, and engagement rates form the scoreboard that dictates success. High numbers trigger bonuses, promotions, and external validation; low numbers demand a swift post-mortem. It is a neat, predictable framework.
Then I stepped into the world of writing, and the entire scoreboard fell apart.
When you publish work online, platforms hand you an elaborate set of dials and gauges. You can see how many people scrolled past your title, how many opened the page, and the exact percentage of readers who stayed past the three-minute mark.
Early on, it is tempting to treat these analytics as an objective measure of worth. A piece that attracts 20,000 views feels like an undeniable victory; a deeply considered essay that yields only 80 views feels like an unmitigated failure.
Yet, as time passed, a stark pattern emerged. High-reach pieces often evaporated into the digital void the moment the algorithmic push subsided. They sparked quick glances, passive nods, and zero lasting friction. They were consumed like fast food: easy to digest, instantly forgotten.
Conversely, some of the lowest-performing essays in terms of volume produced something entirely different: deeply personal emails, substantive private messages, or colleagues reaching out months later to say,'That one essay fundamentally changed the way I approach my team.'
That was when the fundamental contradiction became clear:Reach is easily measurable. Real impact rarely is.
This dilemma is a classic demonstration of Goodhart's Law:When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
When we optimize strictly for what analytics dashboards can capture, we optimize for reach. We craft sharper clickbait hooks, broader generalizations, and frictionless content designed to get quick clicks. But real depth requires friction. Thoughtful insight takes time to process.
Consider the difference:
Reachcaptures attention for five seconds;impactalters a mental model for five years.
Reachshows up in Google Analytics;impacthappens silently in someone's notebook, board meeting, or daily routine.
Reachfeeds the vanity metric machine;impactcreates enduring trust.
No software dashboard will ever alert you when a reader puts down their phone, reflects on an uncomfortable truth, and decides to treat their team with more empathy or pursue a more meaningful project. The most profound transformations in human thought leave no digital footprint.
Letting go of the measurable scoreboard does not mean ignoring data entirely. Metrics are useful for understanding distribution, but they are disastrous as an ethical compass for your work.
If you judge your output purely by reach, you will inevitably drift toward whatever is loud, shallow, and easily consumable. If you instead aim for impact, you accept a slower, quieter path, one where a single reader genuinely moved is worth ten thousand passive scrollers.
Stop chasing the scoreboard built for algorithms. Focus on creating work that actually resonates.
To explore this perspective further, read the original article:
https://medium.com/illumination-curated/reach-is-measurable-but-impact-usually-isnt-9c7c3c7fe573?sk=2e2c55631f12b220f7cdfcd694300915
Share
About the Author:Gary L. Fretwell spent 43 years in higher education consulting, working with nearly a thousand institutions before retiring to Prescott, Arizona. He is a #1 international best-selling author blending neuroscience with Stoic philosophy to help people build a life of lasting significance. He's the author of eight books on intentional living and retirement, including the #1 bestsellerThe Magic of a MomentandIntentional Retirement.On Medium, Gary founded and editsIllumination: Retirement, Aging & Legacy.馃摉garyfretwell.com路 馃摤The Wise Efforton Substack 路 鉁嶏笍Follow on Medium
(0)Comments