Quiet black holes with a stellar companion raise questions about how they form

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Image of the Milky Way showing the locations of three black holes. Credit: ESA/Gaia/DPAC Active black holes are easy to detect. Their superheated accretion disks emit bright X-rays, and the jets streaming from their poles are easily seen at visible and radio wavelengths. But most stellar-mass black holes are inactive. They either drift through the galaxy alone or orbit a companion star without consuming its material. We can't observe inactive black holes directly. We can only observe their effects on nearby objects. We currently know of three such black holes thanks to the Gaia spacecraft. The main mission of Gaia is to map the positions and motions of more than a billion stars in our region of the Milky Way. To achieve its goal, its motion measurements must be precise enough to detect small wobbles in a star's motion. Usually, this means the star has a planet, and the planet's gravitational tug causes the star to wobble. But in at least three cases, the gravitational tug is so large that the companion must have a stellar mass. If it were a star, Gaia would see it. Since Gaia doesn't, the companion must be a black hole. Each of the quiet black holes we've discovered this way has a small stellar companion. This means that in the past, these were asymmetrical binaries, with one star much larger than the other. The remnants of the larger stars became black holes, forming the systems we see today. In one of these systems, Gaia BH3, the binary is fairly wide, just as we would expect. But in the other two, BH1 and BH2, the binaries are much closer. This raises a question about how they formed. When a large star dies, it expands tremendously. A close-orbiting companion would be engulfed by the dying star, causing the two to merge before the system becomes a single black hole. Given the orbits of the companions in BH1 and BH2, how did they survive? One idea is a process known as Roche-lobe overflow. An illustration of the Roche-lobe overflow model for mass transfer. Credit: MPA/A. Olejak The Roche lobe for a particular star is the region of space where its own gravity dominates. Beyond that region, the companion star has a stronger influence. This means that when the outer layers of an expanding star move beyond the Roche lobe, tidal forces allow the material to be captured by the companion star. If the initial material that expands beyond the lobe is diffuse enough, the smaller star could capture it without causing the two stars to spiral into each other. The small companion can then maintain a stable orbit long enough for the large companion to collapse into a black hole. With only three observed systems, we don't have enough evidence to confirm the Roche-lobe overflow model. But this initial study demonstrates that the way asymmetrical binary systems become black hole binaries is more complex than we realized. The findings are published in The Astrophysical Journal. Publication details Aleksandra Olejak et al, Nonconservative Mass Transfer as a Formation Channel for Gaia Black Hole Systems, The Astrophysical Journal (2026). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae8097 Journal information: Astrophysical Journal