I am writing to publicly convey my concerns about fiscal irresponsibility to the citizens I was elected to serve.
There is a deliberate effort to disregard the structural spending problems that have persisted at City Hall for more than five years. Budgeting is about priorities, yet a lack of clear priorities has defined too much of what has happened here.
In a household budget, shelter often consumes the largest share because it is the foundation that keeps a family safe.
In municipal government, public safety is the shelter that keeps us safe.
I, for one, prioritize public safety, and I will never apologize for that.
Asking firefighters to amend their contract and take a pay cut because of a spending problem that members of this council created is buyers' remorse of the worst kind.
The record makes that even harder to accept. Members of this council have supported successive budgets, including multiple deficit versions.
The sudden focus on a balanced budget rings hollow when the same pattern of spending continued year after year during their tenures.
Yet the prevailing impulse is still to seek higher revenues rather than lower expenditures.
A culture of tax and spend has taken root. Recurring costs have outrun revenues for years, forcing reliance on reserves.
The ongoing drawdown of the general fund balance is unsustainable.
Amid a national affordability crisis and persistent inflation, that approach places the burden squarely on residents who are already struggling. Municipal government should lighten the load, not add to it.
I have repeatedly called for an efficiency study and been rebuffed.
Earlier claims that zero-based budgeting would guide this cycle have proven inaccurate, according to current leadership
Taxpayers deserve the leanest government possible that still delivers essential services.
I remain committed to holding the line against unnecessary tax and rate increases.
Before any decision about raising rates or taxes, the city ought to first collect every dollar already owed, eliminate unnecessary outlays, and demonstrate it has put its own house in order.
Without a majority committed to fiscally conservative stewardship, the city remains on a trajectory toward a fiscal cliff.
These patterns demand real accountability from this council.
Government cannot continue to operate by posturing.
What I can agree to, and am prepared to act on, is that if city employees are affected, then members of this council should also be expected to sacrifice.
I am a businessman.
When a company struggles, it hurts all of us, but I, as the leader, am sure to hurt first.
This city is struggling.
With Ward 2 Councilman Joey Hilliard as my second, I have moved to place a formal item on the Sept. 8 City Council agenda directing the city attorney to draft an ordinance repealing the mayor and council compensation schedule or setting it to zero, effective at the earliest date permitted under the City Charter and Texas law. If sacrifice is required at City Hall, allow me to make the first cut. Sincerely,Beaumont At Large City CouncilmanMike Williams
(0)Comments